SOA真题November2003Course8RC

文章作者 100test 发表时间 2007:02:05 16:07:22
来源 100Test.Com百考试题网

COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -1- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – Canada
Morning Session
Society of Actuaries Course 8RC Fall 2003
**BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION 8**
COMPREHENSIVE SEGMENT – CANADA
MORNING SESSION
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
1. (7 points) A NOC executive with 30 years of service plans to retire one year from now at
age 62. It is important to NOC that the executive transitions to retirement over the next
four years.
(a) Describe the benefit incentives that can be offered to help retain this executive.
(b) If you were hired by this executive, provide your recommendation regarding the
negotiation of benefits.
(c) Explain how your answer to (a) would be different if the executive had only eight
years of service with NOC.
(d) Identify the additional considerations that would exist if, instead of being hired by
the executive, you were hired by NOC to provide advice to the executive.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -2- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – Canada
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
2. (11 points) On June 30, 2003, NOC purchased a non-participating annuity contract to
cover the obligations of all the pensioners in the Full-Time Hourly Union Pension Plan.
You are given:
•...The contract cost was $125 million.
•...As of June 30, 2003, NOC has recorded half of its 2003 pension expense and
contributed half of its 2003 contribution.
•...A discount rate of 6.0% was appropriate on June 30, 2003.
•...Valuation results as of June 30, 2003, immediately before the annuity purchase:
Using a 6.5%
Discount Rate
Using a 6.0%
Discount Rate
(All dollars in 000’s)
ABO
Active participants $377,000 $400,000
Deferred vested participants 0 0
Pensioners 103,000 108,000
Total ABO $480,000 $508,000
Service Cost $24,000 $28,000
Market value of assets $320,000 $320,000
Average remaining service period 11.5 11.5
(a) (5 points) Calculate the pension expense for the year 2003. Show all work.
(b) (1 point) Describe the additional considerations if a participating annuity contract
were purchased.
(c) (3 points) Explain how your answer to (a) would differ under IAS 19 and the
rationale for the different requirements.
(d) (2 points) Describe the information NOC will have to provide the insurer for the
purpose of obtaining a quote for the annuity contract.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -3- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – Canada
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
3. (6 points) NOC’s Board of Directors has established the following funding policy for
NOC’s DB ERPs: annual contributions equal to normal cost plus five-year amortization
of unfunded actuarial accrued liability. The CFO of NOC is concerned about the
volatility of funding policy contributions.
(a) Explain the effects of different asset valuation methods on this volatility.
(b) Explain the effects of different asset class allocations on this volatility.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -4- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – Canada
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study
4. (12 points) The law in Gevrey has been changed to permit voluntary employee
contributions of up to 5% of pay to a DC ERP. The tax treatment of these contributions
is the same as for contributions to a PPA.
NOC has decided to change the Full- Time Hourly Union Pension Plan from a flat dollar
plan to a final average earnings plan, and to add a DC ERP for the union employees.
The main provisions of the new plans are:
DB ERP
Normal retirement benefit: 1% of final five-year average earnings
times years of service
Post retirement indexing: 3% per year
Optional form of benefit: Lump Sum
The other provisions of the plan are the same as those in the NOC Full-Time Hourly
Union Pension Plan.
DC ERP
Employee Contributions: Voluntary
Matching Employer contributions: 100% match on the first 3% of employee
contributions
Form of Benefit: Lump sum or periodic pension
(a) Critique the design of the new plans from the perspective of NOC.
(b) Critique the design of the new plans from the perspective of the hourly union
employees.
(c) Assess the current hourly plan asset allocation for the new DB plan.
(d) Describe the considerations in setting investment options to be offered to
participants in the DC ERP.
(e) Predict the socio-economic effects of the change in the law in Gevrey.
COURSE 8: Fall 2003 -5- GO TO NEXT PAGE
Retirement Benefits,
Comprehensive Segment – Canada
Morning Session
All Questions pertain to the Case Study