2011年8月gmat作文机经AA(至8.26)

文章作者 100test 发表时间 2011:08:26 16:29:56
来源 100Test.Com百考试题网

　　1. 本月机经6次
　　V1. B岛国5年前举办了一场足球赛，随后旅游的人数增加，现在某人建议要再办一个国际体育盛会，预计能带来游客数量上升和经济增长。
　　V2.一个岛国B 5年前开了一个足球比赛，最近三年内游客人数涨了25%。所以说为了促进更多的游客来，我们B应该举行更多的比赛。才能带了更多的游客数量和利润。
　　原题：The country of Bonaria held a major soccer event five years ago. Therefore, if the country continues to hold major sport events, tourism will increase rapidly in the country and thus bring benefits to the country’s economy.
　　某个国家5年前办了场运动会，然后发现近三年旅游人数增多鸟，经济都增长了。所以有人提出为了促进经济增长，要再办个国际赛事。
　　考古：
　　[v1]一个B城市:5年前hold an succor competition. 发现相比在这个competition 3年前，在这个competition举办后的3年的number of tourists increased 25%。所有呢，这个B城市打算再举办一次类似的sport event 来吸引游客。这个城市B相信，这个sport event会增加游客人数，同时benefit the country economy.
　　[v2] AA:5年前办了一个足球比赛，后来旅游发展很好，所以我们应该引进更多的国际体育赛事到B市，就可以吸引游客，带动经济发展
　　[v3] B国家五年前hosted a international soccer competition 游客增加 所以市长未来想要再办类似的比赛以增加观光收入和国家收益
　　提供观点：
　　1、错误的由时间先后推出因果关系
　　2、过去的成功不能保证将来，存在他因
　　2. 本月机经3次
　　一个经理在一次会议说，他们公司的一家厂的drill bits一美元的成本能生产10个他们公司的其他的厂只能生产7个。所以为了减少成本，他们应该将所有的drill bits 的生产放到 那家厂，从而实现longterm goal。
　　原题： The following appeared in a presentation by the chief production manager of a machine parts manufacturing company at a management meeting:
　　“Our factory in Cookville is our most advanced and efficient. It is capable of producing ten drill bits for each dollar of production costs, whereas none of our other factories can produce more than seven drill bits per dollar of production costs. Therefore, we can reduce our overall drill bit production costs by devoting the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production. Since reducing the production costs of individual machine parts is the only way to achieve our larger goal of reducing our overall production costs, dedicating the Cookville factory entirely to drill bit production and shifting all other machine part production to our other factories will help us to attain that larger goal.”
　　提供思路：
　　这个argument 的思路绕来绕去就是有three mojor flaws: reduce costs by devoting entirely drill bit production to C. the only way to reduce costs is to reduce production costs. shifting the production of the other parts to other factories is the appropriate way to go
　　针对这三个 direct or indirect conlusions 写就行了
　　1: although C produce more bits per dollar, the reason may be that C has high- skilled workers, total new and high- quality machines, or less amounts of orders(订单) thus entirely shifting is fallacious, the results may be that the workers may be too tired and have too much burden, the machines would be worn out, and all this could contribute to the lowering of the productivity
　　2: the management assumes without further more evidence that reucing the productions costs is the only way to enhance cost -effective production process: 可以train workers , 引进new technologies, 定期维修老旧设备，提高management strategy...
　　3: 就是转移制造这一部分：也许转移制造之后 cargo and transporting fees would roar因为sporadically 分布的 工厂可以及时供货，集中在一个地方不利于 供货， 而且shifting 牵扯到 搬家的费用：那些cumbersome machine怎么转移啊,人员怎么迁移啊。。。这些都是huge expense, may not weighover the elevation of the productivity
　　3.本月机经5次
　　V1. 一个公司要在Park Hill district投资三家businesses，寂静上有。
　　V2.因为过去两年park hill district的三家店，一个影院/戏院，一个pizza店，一个golf club收入增长，建议投资公司投在irongate district的三家店，也是影院，pizza和golf。另外，建议建立一个机制，在其中两家店消费的顾客在第三家店可以享受折扣，这样可以提升利润和投资汇报
　　考古
　　AA：在P district有三家店(theater, pizza, golf club)在过去的两年business都increase了，所以I district也想开这三家店，并且I district决定：如果有去其中两家店的顾客，那么去第三家店可以打折，这样 I district 觉得肯定可以contribute to profit and maximize revenue.
　　V2:一家capital investment company的recommendation：在Park Hill District 开的三家店XX theater，XX playhouse(貌似，反正不重要)和XX Golf Club，两年前盈利increase了，所以作者建议在另一个district也投资新开三家经营范围类似(但品牌不同)的店.另外，采用a program：上前两家消费的顾客在第三家永久享受折扣——那么这三家店每一家都能盈利并且投资公司能赚到钱。
　　提供观点：
　　2、 过去的营业额增长不代表在另一个district开三家店生意能够好，区域之间可能存在差异，错误的类比
　　3、 推理不充分，这种折扣政策能保证三家店的每一家都盈利么?会不会某一家店承担了过多的折扣?
　　某地开了高尔夫、披萨店、还有剧院，表现不俗，于是某投资公司决定在B地也开。
　　原题 125：The following appeared as part of the business plan of the Capital Idea investment firm.
　　“Across town in the Park Hill district, the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick Golf Club have all had business increases within the past two years. Capital Idea should therefore invest in the Roxy Playhouse, the Slice-o’-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new businesses in the Irongate district. As a condition, we should require them to participate in a special program: Any customer who patronizes two of the businesses will receive a substantial discount at the third. By motivating customers to patronize all three, we will thus contribute to the profitability of each and maximize our return.”
　　Capital Idea投资公司的商业计划：
　　在ParkHill区的Thespian剧院，Pizzazz比萨，Niblick高尔夫俱乐部在过去2年都有业务增长。因此Capital Idea应该投资Poxy剧场，Slic-o比萨和Divot高尔夫俱乐部这3家新的Irongate区的企业。为使他们达到条件，我们应该要求他们参加特殊的项目：任何顾客在其中两家消费将在第三家得到折扣。通过刺激顾客在所有3家店消费，我们将增进每一家的利润，从而使我们的回报最大化。
　　观点
　　The author commits a fallcy of false analogy.
　　Therefore the proposal of investment in the Irongate district is groundless. No investment should be made until other factors have been considered and the benefit-cost analysis has been made.
　　The programme suggested by the author is reckless or even ridiculous. The possible result can be the opposite of the author’s imagination because the consumers have interest of only one or two of the three stores.
　　The business increases occured in the past two years. No one can guarantee the future profit.
　　The three new companies are not necessarily analogous to those profitable ones.
　　The condition that is required is absurd. There is no causal relatioship between the condition and the collective profit.