超越700:GMAT算分秘技(2)

文章作者 100test 发表时间 2008:07:01 09:59:17
来源 100Test.Com百考试题网


   Many people come to GMAT preparation in mortal fear of the quantitative section. Probability! Exponents and roots! The entire section seems like a parade of horribles. Unfortunately, many of these people spend the bulk of their study efforts honing their math skills at the expense of their verbal preparation. Certainly a great performance on each section is ideal, but experience has shown that an excellent verbal performance affects ones overall score more dramatically than does an excellent performance in quantitative.
   Lets take a look at what happens at the highest levels of the exam: 700 . A recent test-taker received a scaled score of 45 in verbal (98th percentile) and 40 in quant (66th percentile) and an overall score of 700 (93rd percentile). Notice how much closer the overall percentile is to the excellent verbal percentile. If the overall percentile were simply an average of the individual percentiles, this person would have received about 640. But because the combination of an outstanding verbal performance with a fair quant performance is so rare, the overall percentile and score will be much higher than the lower quant percentile. Another person, who scored 49 in verbal (99th percentile) and 37 in quant (56th percentile), received 710 (95th percentile), even though the quant performance here was a full 10 percentile points lower than that in the previous example. Again, an outstanding performance in verbal significantly offset a middling performance in quant.
   Does this work in reverse? That is, will an outstanding performance in quant so dramatically offset a middling performance in verbal? No. This combination is much more common, given the increasing number of international test-takers, who often have excellent math skills but relatively weak command of English. Even among native speakers of English, it is more common to see relatively high quant scores coupled with fair to middling verbal scores. Because these combinations are less rare, they are not rewarded as highly. For example, a test-taker recently received a 50 in quant (97th percentile) and a 37 in verbal (82nd percentile), but "only" a 670 overall (89th percentile). So the truly excellent quant performance was not enough to pull the overall score above 700.
   While an excellent verbal performance can indeed take up some of the slack from a weaker quant score, keep in mind that most business schools want to see strong skills in both sections. In fact, some of the top 20 schools apply the "80/80 rule", which requires that successful applicants reach at least the 80th percentile in both sections. So do not put all your eggs in one basket: make sure you prepare well for both sections.
   Next week, we will discuss breaking the 750 mark.


相关文章


GMAT语文考试指导:逻辑题思维训练
GMAT语法练习:套装题SECTIONA
超越700:GMAT算分秘技(4)
超越700:GMAT算分秘技(3)
超越700:GMAT算分秘技(2)
超越700:GMAT算分秘技(1)
GMAT语法练习套装题(十六)
GMAT语法练习套装题(十五)
GMAT语法练习套装题(十四)
澳大利亚华人论坛
考好网
日本华人论坛
华人移民留学论坛
英国华人论坛