与《IELTS考试技能训练教程-阅读》有关的两个问题

文章作者 100test 发表时间 2007:04:03 15:11:10
来源 100Test.Com百考试题网

《IELTS考试技能训练教程--阅读》介绍

有关北语的两道阅读题
practice test 3 中的 passage 2 ,page 188 --------question 14 判断 y/n/ng
题目：the drug lords in columbia have managed to acquire sams through illegal channels .
在原文中找到的对应文字是：although the columbian drug cartels have apparently never used such weapons before --------and there is still no hard evidence that they have acquired them--------there are certainly plenty of sams ,primarily us-made stingers and soviet-bulit as-7grails ,available through illegal channels .
我判断的是n，因为 there is still no hard evidence that they have acquired them。但是答案是ng。仔细想了一下是不是因为没有过硬的证据并不意味着哥伦比亚的毒枭没有acquire sams ，也就是说可能有过，只不过没有被发现而已，所以正确答案是 ng ？

另外一个是practice test 4 ,passage 1 ，page197-------question 9 也是判断 y/n/ng
题目：the general public so far have responded to general public positively .
我拿不定主意应该是判断为 n 还是 ng 。在原文中没有一段是说 general public 对general public 的反应的 ，按理应为 ng 。但是在 g 段谈到 environmentalists 以及 other consumer advocates 有 call for tougher scrutiny ,the public has a right to know whats in its food .并且在下面一段里还有评论家关心在新的食品中会不会有潜在的使人过敏的东西。所以我觉得公众的反应不是 positively 的，就选了n 。但是答案是 ng 。我想是不是因为 environmentalists 以及 other consumer advocates 还有评论家不属于 general public 的范围。？
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

发贴人：北语雅思

Diana 2002-1-13在100test上与《IELTS考试技能训练教程-阅读》有关的两个问题：

1、 practice test 3 中的 passage 2 ,page 188 --------question 14 判断 y/n/ng
题目：the drug lords in columbia have managed to acquire sams through illegal channels .
在原文中找到的对应文字是：although the columbian drug cartels have apparently never used such weapons before --------and there is still no hard evidence that they have acquired them--------there are certainly plenty of sams ,primarily us-made stingers and soviet-bulit as-7grails ,available through illegal channels .
我判断的是n，因为 there is still no hard evidence that they have acquired them。但是答案是ng。仔细想了一下是不是因为没有过硬的证据并不意味着哥伦比亚的毒枭没有acquire sams ，也就是说可能有过，只不过没有被发现而已，所以正确答案是 ng ？

答：原题的意思是：毒枭已经通过非法渠道获取了SAM。虽然文中有两处与此有关：1、(p187, line 3) the Columbian cocaine cartels may be stockpiling such devices（注意：是 may be）.2、(p187, paragraph 4) there is still no hard evidence that they have acquired them（没有确凿的证据），但均不能以此来断言“毒枭已经有了SAM”或“毒枭尚未获得SAM”。因此，原题的核心思想既未在文中得到证实，也未得到反驳。

2、另外一个是practice test 4 ,passage 1 ，page197-------question 9 也是判断 y/n/ng
题目：the general public so far have responded to general public positively .
我拿不定主意应该是判断为 n 还是 ng 。在原文中没有一段是说 general public 对转基因食品的反应的 ，按理应为 ng 。但是在 g 段谈到 environmentalists 以及 other consumer advocates 有 call for tougher scrutiny ,the public has a right to know whats in its food .并且在下面一段里还有评论家关心在新的食品中会不会有潜在的使人过敏的东西。所以我觉得公众的反应不是 positively 的，就选了n 。但是答案是 ng 。我想是不是因为 environmentalists 以及 other consumer advocates 还有评论家不属于 general public 的范围。

答：the general public应该是指“老百姓”、“广大消费者”。文中的到的各类人（environmentalists. other consumer advocates. Vice President. deputy director of the FDA’s Office of Biotechnology等）均不属于这个范畴。因此，大众对此的态度是欢迎还是抵制、怀疑等，无法判断。